Independent research Market structure and acquisition activity
Longfield Intel researches ownership change across enterprise technology and the markets next to it. Who is acquiring, on what terms, and what the pattern leaves for whoever is still independent. Every figure carries its source. Where sources disagree, the report shows the disagreement rather than picking the more convenient number.
01 Position
Most competitive intelligence available to buy is monitoring. It watches announcements and routes them to you quickly. That is genuinely useful, and it is a different thing from knowing what an announcement does to your position, which is the part that takes work.
A market map is worth something because you can check it. Every claim in a Longfield report is cited inline. Where a figure comes from a deal tracker, the report names the tracker. Where two trackers disagree, and in most markets they disagree constantly, the report carries both numbers and records why they differ.
That habit is the whole method. It is also the reason these reports take longer to produce than the alternative, and the reason they survive being checked.
02 Method
Six stages, run in the same order on every engagement. The sequence is fixed so that two reports written a year apart stay comparable, and so any figure can be traced back to the document it came from without anyone having to ask.
Markets get counted badly when vendor category labels are allowed to do the work. The perimeter is drawn on architecture and on what a product actually displaces, then recorded as an explicit inclusion rule. Companies sitting across two categories are assigned once, and the assignment is written into the report, so the same revenue never lands in two totals.
Collection opens with filings, registry entries, merger control notices, offer documents and transcripts. Deal trackers and press coverage come in afterwards as corroboration rather than as the base layer. Each item is logged with its publisher, its publication date and the date it was pulled, because a figure that was current in March is not the same figure in November.
Every numeric claim goes into an evidence ledger against the sources that support it. Where two sources give different values for the same transaction, both are held in a variance register alongside the reason for the gap, whether that is an earn-out counted differently, a currency conversion date, or a category boundary somebody else drew elsewhere. Nothing is quietly split down the middle.
Analysis runs on concentration and cadence. Deal count set against disclosed value. Where the value pools sit and how few transactions hold them. Which acquirers are buying capability and which are buying revenue. Valuation bands by category and by point in the cycle, with the undisclosed share stated openly instead of being dropped out of the denominator.
Before release, each claim is checked back against its ledger entry and each citation is opened again. A claim that has lost its source is cut rather than softened into something vaguer. The report is then version stamped, so a reader knows precisely which state of the market it describes and can tell later work apart from earlier work.
Reports kept on refresh are re-run against the perimeter they were built with, so movement is real movement rather than a change of definition. Figures that moved are marked, and the previous value stays visible next to the new one. A map that quietly rewrites itself is not a map anyone can audit.
The working material ships with the document. A report that cannot be interrogated after delivery is a slide deck with footnotes.
03 Coverage
The method does not change between them. Public records read carefully, every figure carried with the source it came from, and competing figures shown side by side rather than settled by preference. Only the subject changes.
Practice one
Coverage follows consolidation rather than sector fashion. Most of the work sits in enterprise technology and the infrastructure underneath it, with a second line in the built environment, where the same roll-up mechanics run over far more fragmented ground.
Practice two
For construction, trades and contracting businesses. The same records work, applied at county and village level. Which programmes pay for the work, which of them a business is not enrolled in yet, who else is registered to do it locally, and where the demand actually sits.
04 Publications
Four formats. Each is built on the same protocol and ships with the same working material behind it.
05 Current report
Sector landscape · Free to read
Acquisition activity and market structure across enterprise security, 2025 to 2026. Nineteen pages, sourced throughout, with competing figures shown side by side wherever the trackers do not agree.
06 Engagements
Scoped in writing before anything starts, then delivered against that scope.
Reports are commissioned individually or kept on a quarterly refresh. The refresh is where most of the value sits. A market map is worth considerably more when it is still accurate six months later, and most of these markets move fast enough that most maps are not.
Scoping is written down first: the perimeter, which sources will be treated as primary, the questions the report has to answer, and the date the market state gets fixed. Changes to scope are re-quoted rather than absorbed quietly, because a perimeter that drifts halfway through produces a report nobody can compare to anything.
Longfield Intel is independent. It takes no fees from the companies it writes about, and it does not act as a broker or an intermediary in any transaction it covers.
07 Contact
Nick Gveluka, analyst
The market, and the decision sitting behind the question, is enough to start. Scoping conversations carry no charge and no obligation.